On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 17:36:12 -0500 Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Add a kernel-doc test script to tools/testing/kernel-doc. > > radix_tree_lookup_slot test case provided by Matthew Wilcox. > > Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > tools/testing/kernel-doc/test-case.h | 111 ++++++++++ > .../testing/kernel-doc/test-case.man.expected | 150 ++++++++++++++ > .../kernel-doc/test-case.none.expected | 0 > .../kernel-doc/test-case.rst2.expected | 195 ++++++++++++++++++ > .../kernel-doc/test-case.rst3.expected | 195 ++++++++++++++++++ > tools/testing/kernel-doc/test.sh | 90 ++++++++ > 6 files changed, 741 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 tools/testing/kernel-doc/test-case.h > create mode 100644 tools/testing/kernel-doc/test-case.man.expected > create mode 100644 tools/testing/kernel-doc/test-case.none.expected > create mode 100644 tools/testing/kernel-doc/test-case.rst2.expected > create mode 100644 tools/testing/kernel-doc/test-case.rst3.expected > create mode 100755 tools/testing/kernel-doc/test.sh Seems like a good thing to have overall. I do worry a bit that the test will be sensitive to *any* change to kernel-doc output, including formatting changes that might be deliberate. But if that turns out to be a problem in the real world, we can deal with it then. Thanks, jon