On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 03:21:06PM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > On Fri, 30 Oct 2020 15:47:13 +0100 > Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > From: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Example of typedef that was not parsed by kernel-doc: > > > > typedef void (ObjectUnparent)(Object *obj); > > > > Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> > > So as you've undoubtedly noticed, reading those kernel-doc regexes is ... a > wee bit on the painful side. Trying to compare two of them in a patch to > figure out what you have done is even worse. I suspect we want these > patches, but can you please supply a changelog that describes the change? Better ... can we have a test suite for the regexes and make patches to them include updates to the test suite? They have clearly passed the point of human understanding ;-)
