Ah, good point. It looks like you've already added the drm-misc-next and drm
maintainers to here so as long as they're aware that should be fine
On Wed, 2020-10-21 at 12:11 +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Hi Lyude,
>
> Em Tue, 13 Oct 2020 15:49:11 -0400
> Lyude Paul <lyude@xxxxxxxxxx> escreveu:
>
> > wait, I think there's some confusion here. these patches have already been
> > pushed
>
> As the patch adding the warning was merged upstream at the 5.10 merge
> window, the fixup one should also be added there, instead of waiting
> until 5.11 ;-)
>
> So, if OK for you, I'll send this upstream via my tree by the end of
> the merge window, as our goal is that 5.10 won't have doc warnings.
>
> Regards,
> Mauro
> >
> > On Tue, 2020-10-13 at 14:14 +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > > The name of the argument is different, causing those warnings:
> > >
> > > ./drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c:3754: warning: Function parameter or
> > > member
> > > 'video_code' not described in 'drm_display_mode_from_cea_vic'
> > > ./drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c:3754: warning: Excess function parameter
> > > 'vic' description in 'drm_display_mode_from_cea_vic'
> > >
> > > Fixes: 7af655bce275 ("drm/dp: Add drm_dp_downstream_mode()")
> > > Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 2 +-
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> > > index a82f37d44258..631125b46e04 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> > > @@ -3741,7 +3741,7 @@ drm_add_cmdb_modes(struct drm_connector
> > > *connector, u8
> > > svd)
> > > /**
> > > * drm_display_mode_from_cea_vic() - return a mode for CEA VIC
> > > * @dev: DRM device
> > > - * @vic: CEA VIC of the mode
> > > + * @video_code: CEA VIC of the mode
> > > *
> > > * Creates a new mode matching the specified CEA VIC.
> > > *
>
>
> Thanks,
> Mauro
>
--
Cheers,
Lyude Paul (she/her)
Software Engineer at Red Hat
