wait, I think there's some confusion here. these patches have already been
pushed
On Tue, 2020-10-13 at 14:14 +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> The name of the argument is different, causing those warnings:
>
> ./drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c:3754: warning: Function parameter or member
> 'video_code' not described in 'drm_display_mode_from_cea_vic'
> ./drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c:3754: warning: Excess function parameter
> 'vic' description in 'drm_display_mode_from_cea_vic'
>
> Fixes: 7af655bce275 ("drm/dp: Add drm_dp_downstream_mode()")
> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> index a82f37d44258..631125b46e04 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> @@ -3741,7 +3741,7 @@ drm_add_cmdb_modes(struct drm_connector *connector, u8
> svd)
> /**
> * drm_display_mode_from_cea_vic() - return a mode for CEA VIC
> * @dev: DRM device
> - * @vic: CEA VIC of the mode
> + * @video_code: CEA VIC of the mode
> *
> * Creates a new mode matching the specified CEA VIC.
> *
--
Sincerely,
Lyude Paul (she/her)
Software Engineer at Red Hat
Note: I deal with a lot of emails and have a lot of bugs on my plate. If you've
asked me a question, are waiting for a review/merge on a patch, etc. and I
haven't responded in a while, please feel free to send me another email to check
on my status. I don't bite!
