On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 23:30:10 +0530 Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Remove extra ')' after function name to fix warnings. > It solves following warning : > WARNING: Unparseable C cross-reference: 'groups_sort)' > Invalid C declaration: Expected end of definition. [error at 11] > > Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/security/credentials.rst | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/security/credentials.rst b/Documentation/security/credentials.rst > index 282e79feee6a..d51e42b92395 100644 > --- a/Documentation/security/credentials.rst > +++ b/Documentation/security/credentials.rst > @@ -455,7 +455,7 @@ When replacing the group list, the new list must be sorted before it > is added to the credential, as a binary search is used to test for > membership. In practice, this means :c:func:`groups_sort` should be > called before :c:func:`set_groups` or :c:func:`set_current_groups`. > -:c:func:`groups_sort)` must not be called on a ``struct group_list`` which > +:c:func:`groups_sort` must not be called on a ``struct group_list`` which > is shared as it may permute elements as part of the sorting process > even if the array is already sorted. So this is a great fix, thanks for sending it. That said, there are a couple of ways in which this fix can be made even better: - The simpler of the two is to change the subject line of the patch. "Fix a warning" is almost never a good description of what you're doing; what you are actually doing is fixing a broken cross reference. So the subject line should say that. - In this case, though, there is a much better thing to do. We deprecated the use of :c:func: around a year ago; the docs build system can now do the right thing automatically. So a fix that would both eliminate the warning and improve the document as a whole would be to replace every instance of: :c:func:`function_name` with: function_name() Is there any chance I could get you to send a patch that does that? Thanks, jon
