On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 08:05:30AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 12:01:41AM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote: > > On Thu, 14 May 2020 15:45:58 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 07:03:33AM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote: > > >> On Thu, 14 May 2020 10:16:56 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > >>> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 08:46:18AM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote: > > >>>> On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 06:39:03AM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote: > > >>>>> From 96fa6680e3b990633ecbb6d11acf03a161b790bd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > >>>>> From: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx> > > >>>>> Date: Sun, 10 May 2020 15:12:57 +0900 > > >>>>> Subject: [PATCH RESEND 3/4] Documentation/litmus-tests: Merge atomic's README into top-level one > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Where Documentation/litmus-tests/README lists RCU litmus tests, > > >>>>> Documentation/litmus-tests/atomic/README lists atomic litmus tests. > > >>>>> For symmetry, merge the latter into former, with some context > > >>>>> adjustment in the introduction. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Signed-off-by: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx> > > >>>>> Acked-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@xxxxxxxxx> > > >>>>> Acked-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > >>>> > > >>>> Acked-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx> > > >>>> > > >>>> Thanks! > > >>> > > >>> Applied, and thank you all! > > >>> > > >>> I rebased, cancelling the revert with the original, resulting in an > > >>> updated lkmm branch on -rcu. There was one minor conflict, so could > > >>> one of you please check to make sure that I resolved things appropriately? > > >> > > >> One thing I noticed. > > >> > > >> Commit b2998782ded4 ("Documentation/litmus-tests: Clarify about the RCU > > >> pre-initialization test")'s change log says: > > >> > > >> Since this test returned to tools/memory-model/, make sure that it is > > >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > >> at least referenced from Documentation/litmus-tests/'s README. > > >> > > >> Because of the rebase, this needs amendment as well as the title. > > >> > > >> Something like > > >> > > >> Documentation/litumus-tests: Cite a relevant litmus test in tools/memory-model > > >> > > >> For ease of finding the RCU related litmus test under > > >> tools/memory-model/, add an entry in README. > > >> > > >> ? > > > > > > Good catch, and yes, I will update that on the next rebase. > > > > > > Any other things in need of adjustment? > > > > Aside from the missing Signed-off-by tags Stephen pointed out, I don't > > see anything. > > Yeah, I did mess that up! ;-) > > Thank you for checking!!! And I have fixed these during the merge with Thomas's and Peter's series (or at least the noinstr-rcu-nmi-2020-05-15 portion of it), again, thank you! Thanx, Paul