On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 12:01:41AM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote: > On Thu, 14 May 2020 15:45:58 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 07:03:33AM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote: > >> On Thu, 14 May 2020 10:16:56 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > >>> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 08:46:18AM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote: > >>>> On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 06:39:03AM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote: > >>>>> From 96fa6680e3b990633ecbb6d11acf03a161b790bd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > >>>>> From: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx> > >>>>> Date: Sun, 10 May 2020 15:12:57 +0900 > >>>>> Subject: [PATCH RESEND 3/4] Documentation/litmus-tests: Merge atomic's README into top-level one > >>>>> > >>>>> Where Documentation/litmus-tests/README lists RCU litmus tests, > >>>>> Documentation/litmus-tests/atomic/README lists atomic litmus tests. > >>>>> For symmetry, merge the latter into former, with some context > >>>>> adjustment in the introduction. > >>>>> > >>>>> Signed-off-by: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx> > >>>>> Acked-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@xxxxxxxxx> > >>>>> Acked-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>>> > >>>> Acked-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx> > >>>> > >>>> Thanks! > >>> > >>> Applied, and thank you all! > >>> > >>> I rebased, cancelling the revert with the original, resulting in an > >>> updated lkmm branch on -rcu. There was one minor conflict, so could > >>> one of you please check to make sure that I resolved things appropriately? > >> > >> One thing I noticed. > >> > >> Commit b2998782ded4 ("Documentation/litmus-tests: Clarify about the RCU > >> pre-initialization test")'s change log says: > >> > >> Since this test returned to tools/memory-model/, make sure that it is > >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > >> at least referenced from Documentation/litmus-tests/'s README. > >> > >> Because of the rebase, this needs amendment as well as the title. > >> > >> Something like > >> > >> Documentation/litumus-tests: Cite a relevant litmus test in tools/memory-model > >> > >> For ease of finding the RCU related litmus test under > >> tools/memory-model/, add an entry in README. > >> > >> ? > > > > Good catch, and yes, I will update that on the next rebase. > > > > Any other things in need of adjustment? > > Aside from the missing Signed-off-by tags Stephen pointed out, I don't > see anything. Yeah, I did mess that up! ;-) Thank you for checking!!! Thanx, Paul