On Tue, 12 Nov 2019 16:17:32 +0200 Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Fix the references in both places to actually make them cross > references. See below. > > BR, > Jani. > > > diff --git a/Documentation/process/programming-language.rst b/Documentation/process/programming-language.rst > index e5f5f065dc24..59efa6d7a053 100644 > --- a/Documentation/process/programming-language.rst > +++ b/Documentation/process/programming-language.rst > @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ > Programming Language > ==================== > > -The kernel is written in the C programming language [c-language]_. > +The kernel is written in the C programming language `[c-language]`_. > More precisely, the kernel is typically compiled with ``gcc`` [gcc]_ > under ``-std=gnu89`` [gcc-c-dialect-options]_: the GNU dialect of ISO C90 > (including some C99 features). > @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ in order to feature detect which ones can be used and/or to shorten the code. > > Please refer to ``include/linux/compiler_attributes.h`` for more information. > > -.. [c-language] http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/standards > +.. _[c-language]: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/standards > .. [gcc] https://gcc.gnu.org > .. [clang] https://clang.llvm.org > .. [icc] https://software.intel.com/en-us/c-compilers That fixes this particular instance, while leaving the adjacent ones untouched :) I think this is a good change, especially if applied to all instances. I also wonder, though, if we should adopt a rule that translations need unique labels - prepend "IT-" or some such for the Italian translation, for example? Thanks, jon
