Re: [PATCH 2/3] null_blk: fix module name at log message

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9/12/19 5:47 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 9/12/19 9:47 AM, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
>> Hi André, Jens,
>>
>> On Wed, 2019-09-11 at 11:46 -0300, André Almeida wrote:
>>> The name of the module is "null_blk", not "null". Make `pr_info()` follow
>>> the pattern of `pr_err()` log messages.
>>>
>>
>> Instead of doing these fixes manually, it's more consistent and smarter
>> to use pr_fmt. There are many examples of drivers doing that.
>>
>> I don't know if this patch can be dropped, and replaced with one used pr_fmt
>> or if doesn't worth the trouble.
>>
>> It would be even better to also patch Documentation/process/coding-style.rst,
>> in particular the printing section, making a mention to pr_fmt.
> 
> André, please address the comments in this email and from Willy. Note
> that the previous patch is queued up, so you'll need to make it relative
> to that.
> 

Ok Jens, I'll do it.



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux