Standard integer promotion is already done and %hx and %hhx is useless so do not encourage the use of %hh[xudi] or %h[xudi]. As Linus said in: Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=wgoxnmsj8GEVFJSvTwdnWm8wVJthefNk2n6+4TC=20e0Q@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ It's a pointless warning, making for more complex code, and making people remember esoteric printf format details that have no reason for existing. The "h" and "hh" things should never be used. The only reason for them being used if if you have an "int", but you want to print it out as a "char" (and honestly, that is a really bad reason, you'd be better off just using a proper cast to make the code more obvious). So if what you have a "char" (or unsigned char) you should always just print it out as an "int", knowing that the compiler already did the proper type conversion. Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- Documentation/core-api/printk-formats.rst | 16 ++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/printk-formats.rst b/Documentation/core-api/printk-formats.rst index c6224d039bcb..ecbebf4ca8e7 100644 --- a/Documentation/core-api/printk-formats.rst +++ b/Documentation/core-api/printk-formats.rst @@ -13,10 +13,10 @@ Integer types If variable is of Type, use printk format specifier: ------------------------------------------------------------ - char %hhd or %hhx - unsigned char %hhu or %hhx - short int %hd or %hx - unsigned short int %hu or %hx + char %d or %x + unsigned char %u or %x + short int %d or %x + unsigned short int %u or %x int %d or %x unsigned int %u or %x long %ld or %lx @@ -25,10 +25,10 @@ Integer types unsigned long long %llu or %llx size_t %zu or %zx ssize_t %zd or %zx - s8 %hhd or %hhx - u8 %hhu or %hhx - s16 %hd or %hx - u16 %hu or %hx + s8 %d or %x + u8 %u or %x + s16 %d or %x + u16 %u or %x s32 %d or %x u32 %u or %x s64 %lld or %llx
