Re: [PATCH 0/6] Address issues with SPDX requirements and PEP-263

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Em Thu, 05 Sep 2019 13:05:08 -0700
Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> escreveu:

> On Thu, 2019-09-05 at 16:57 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > The  description at Documentation/process/license-rules.rst is very strict
> > with regards to the position where the SPDX tags should be.  
> []
> > PS.: I sent already a RFC version for those patches along with this
> > thread:
> > 
> >     https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/b32c2e46b91e7bcda2a9bd140673f06d71b2487a.camel@xxxxxxxxxxx/  
> 
> Nice, thanks.
> 
> Now I guess I have to update checkpatch too.
> (unless you want to... ;)

Yeah, it makes sense to update checkpatch too. Perhaps it could be
changed to use the "-s" flag on the check, instead of implementing
its own logic to handle the position.

Thanks,
Mauro



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux