On 2019-02-26 19:20, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 02:33:41PM +0800, liaoweixiong wrote: >> Why should we need pstore_block? >> 1. Most embedded intelligent equipment have no persistent ram, which >> increases costs. We perfer to cheaper solutions, like block devices. >> In fast, there is already a sample for block device logger in driver >> MTD (drivers/mtd/mtdoops.c). >> 2. Do not any equipment have battery, which means that it lost all data >> on general ram if power failure. Pstore has little to do for these >> equipments. >> >> [PATCH v10] > > Why are you still labeling these as "RFC"? No one should actually be > applying a Request For Comments patchset, as you obviously are not > thinking it is ready to be merged :( > > After 10 revisions, I hope you are confident in this patchset :) > I'm confident in this patchset :) . It is first time for me to submit RFC patches, i just don't know i should change the label to PATCH. Thank you for reminding me. > thanks, > > greg k-h > -- liaoweixiong
