Re: [PATCH v6 01/10] i3c: Add core I3C infrastructure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Boris,


On 24-08-2018 13:39, Boris Brezillon wrote:
Hi Vitor,

On Wed, 22 Aug 2018 17:43:34 +0100
vitor <Vitor.Soares@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Boris,


On 19-07-2018 16:29, Boris Brezillon wrote:
+int i3c_bus_register(struct i3c_bus *i3cbus)
+{
+	struct i2c_dev_desc *desc;
+
+	i3c_bus_for_each_i2cdev(i3cbus, desc) {
+		switch (desc->boardinfo->lvr & I3C_LVR_I2C_INDEX_MASK) {
+		case I3C_LVR_I2C_INDEX(0):
+			if (i3cbus->mode < I3C_BUS_MODE_MIXED_FAST)
+				i3cbus->mode = I3C_BUS_MODE_MIXED_FAST;
+			break;
+
+		case I3C_LVR_I2C_INDEX(1):
+		case I3C_LVR_I2C_INDEX(2):
+			if (i3cbus->mode < I3C_BUS_MODE_MIXED_SLOW)
+				i3cbus->mode = I3C_BUS_MODE_MIXED_SLOW;
+			break;
+
+		default:
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+	}
+
+	if (!i3cbus->scl_rate.i3c)
+		i3cbus->scl_rate.i3c = I3C_BUS_TYP_I3C_SCL_RATE;
+
+	if (!i3cbus->scl_rate.i2c) {
+		if (i3cbus->mode == I3C_BUS_MODE_MIXED_SLOW)
+			i3cbus->scl_rate.i2c = I3C_BUS_I2C_FM_SCL_RATE;
+		else
+			i3cbus->scl_rate.i2c = I3C_BUS_I2C_FM_PLUS_SCL_RATE;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * I3C/I2C frequency may have been overridden, check that user-provided
+	 * values are not exceeding max possible frequency.
+	 */
+	if (i3cbus->scl_rate.i3c > I3C_BUS_MAX_I3C_SCL_RATE ||
+	    i3cbus->scl_rate.i2c > I3C_BUS_I2C_FM_PLUS_SCL_RATE) {
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	dev_set_name(&i3cbus->dev, "i3c-%d", i3cbus->id);
+
+	return device_add(&i3cbus->dev);
+}
During the tests of the bus with i2c devices I found the i2c_dev_desc
objects aren't allocated before this function. This cause i3cbus->mode =
I3C_BUS_MODE_PURE.
I just checked and DT parsing (+ I2C descs creation) is done before
i3c_bus_register() is called, so we should be good. How did you declare
your I2C devices (right now, only DT declaration is supported).
During the DT parsing, you create the i2c_dev_boardinfo. the i2c_dev_desc is created in i3c_master_bus_init() which is after the i3c_mater_create_bus(). One possible way to fix this is to pass master also to i3c_bus_register and iterate over i2c_dev_board_info list.

I want to do something for the slave and secondary master, do you
already have infrastructure that you can share?
What do you mean?

Regards,

Boris

I want start to add the secondary master functionality but it is also necessary to add the infrastructure to the subsystem. So, to avoid duplicated work can you share your plans for the secondary master?

Best regards,
Vitor Soares





[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux