On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 10:50:42AM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, Waiman. > > A short update. I tried making root special while keeping the > existing threaded semantics but I didn't really like it because we > have to couple controller enables/disables with threaded > enables/disables. I'm now trying a simpler, albeit a bit more > tedious, approach which should leave things mostly symmetrical. I'm > hoping to be able to post mostly working patches this week. I've not had time to look at any of this. But the question I'm most curious about is how cgroup-v2 preserves the container invariant. That is, each container (namespace) should look like a 'real' machine. So just like userns allows to have a uid-0 (aka root) for each container and pidns allows a pid-1 for each container, cgroupns should provide a root group for each container. And cgroup-v2 has this 'exception' (aka wart) for the root group which needs to be replicated for each namespace. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
