>>> Information from a commit like "docs: sphinxify coccinelle.txt and add it >>> to dev-tools" caught also my software development attention. >>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/Documentation/coccinelle.txt?id=4b9033a33494ec9154d63e706e9e47f7eb3fd59e >>> >>> Did an other information from a comment become outdated in the script "coccicheck" >>> because of such changes for the documentation format? >>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/scripts/coccicheck?id=c802e87fbe2d4dd58982d01b3c39bc5a781223aa#n4 >> >> How about submitting a patch to fix the problem? > > Is the published commit (from 2016-08-08 / 2016-08-18) generally questionable > as I see it by the interface "cgit" at the moment? > > * Does this one contain only the deletion of the file "Documentation/coccinelle.txt"? It seems that I got an inappropriate impression from this kind of data display alone. The display for the changed file name contains only the desired addition. https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst?id=4b9033a33494ec9154d63e706e9e47f7eb3fd59e > I find another data display also interesting and more promising. > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9269973/ > > * Should this patch about the desired file format conversion become available > also by the other known interfaces? The interface "cgit v0.12" does not indicate the involved "renaming" (similarity index 56%) so far which can be better seen in the downloadable patch file. Regards, Markus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
