>> Information from a commit like "docs: sphinxify coccinelle.txt and add it >> to dev-tools" caught also my software development attention. >> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/Documentation/coccinelle.txt?id=4b9033a33494ec9154d63e706e9e47f7eb3fd59e >> >> Did an other information from a comment become outdated in the script "coccicheck" >> because of such changes for the documentation format? >> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/scripts/coccicheck?id=c802e87fbe2d4dd58982d01b3c39bc5a781223aa#n4 > > How about submitting a patch to fix the problem? Is the published commit (from 2016-08-08 / 2016-08-18) generally questionable as I see it by the interface "cgit" at the moment? * Does this one contain only the deletion of the file "Documentation/coccinelle.txt"? * How should the result from the mentioned action "add it to dev-tools" look like finally? * How could the acknowledgements happen for a software transformation which seems to be incomplete there? I find another data display also interesting and more promising. https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9269973/ * Should this patch about the desired file format conversion become available also by the other known interfaces? * Would it have been nicer to include a corresponding update for the file "scripts/coccicheck" there, too? * Do we need to clarify the distribution of the correct version any further? Regards, Markus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
