Re: Kernel docs: muddying the waters a bit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:24:04 +0100
> Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> > Worth noting is that, AFAICT, in all of the proposals, including the
>> > original where kernel-doc produces docbook, this autoreferencing only
>> > works within parts processed by kernel-doc. Not in the template
>> > documents themselves. (You can still use the markup's more verbose cross
>> > referencing keywords.)
>>
>> It works everywhere, even in the docbook template, as long as you mark
>> it up correctly. Which in docbook means <function>func</function>.
>
> In Sphinx that's :func:`function_name`.  Not a thing of beauty, but it
> works.

Compared to <function>function_name</function> already an improvement.
I can very much live with this ;-)
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux