On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 11:14 PM, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 13:27:04 +0100 > Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> One concern/open I have for pro/cons are the hyperlinks from kerneldoc >> comments. Currently we have the postproc hack, iirc Jani's patches >> generated links native when extracting the kerneldoc. What's the >> solution with spinx? > > So I've been trying to figure out what this refers to. Is this the > cross-reference links within the document? When I did my sphinx hack it > used a technique that, shall we say, strongly resembles what Jani's > patches did. One difference is that Sphinx has the concept of > "functions" built into it, so I use function references for those. That's what I meant. As long as I can type in stuff like func(), &struct and similar and get a link for it automatically (plus anywhere else in the templated stuff for function headers) I'm really happy. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
