Re: [PATCH] Documentation/EDID: Fixed errors in sample code.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Jon,

The vsync fields in the sample code are incorrectly adjusted. Remove the
subtraction of 63 from the offset and pulsewidth fields, and update the
associated comment.

So I'm not really in a position to judge the correctness of this patch.
It would have been good to copy Carsten, who was the author of that file;
I'll do so now.  Carsten, any thoughts on this one?
Any improvement is more than welcome, but I am a little concerned that the CRC changed which means that the binary EDIDs changed. I know that the original version was used bu a number of people for various distros to create additional EDIDs. And I am using them in nearly all farm systems. In consequence, I would like to recreate the EDIDs I am using, and I also should forward the new formula to the users I know to make sure that the graphics boards still work. But I need some more time to do so.

Thanks,
Carsten.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux