Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] Watchdog: introduce ARM SBSA watchdog driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Guenter , Timur

On 30 May 2015 at 06:10, Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 05/29/2015 08:46 AM, Timur Tabi wrote:
>>
>> On 05/29/2015 09:32 AM, Fu Wei wrote:
>>>
>>> It is a SPI, every CPU can get it,
>>> But maybe I miss something, but please let me know if other CPU can
>>> not get the interrupt.
>>
>>
>> There's only one watchdog device, so there's only one interrupt.  I don't
>> know which CPU will get the interrupt, but the watchdog is not a per-CPU
>> device.
>>
> Plus, that one interrupt is not shared, and the driver returns
> IRQ_HANDLED even if the bit is not set. So _something_ is definitely
> wrong. Either the interrupt is shared, then it needs to be requested
> as shared and the handler should only return IRQ_HANDLED if it actually
> handles the interrupt. Or it is not shared and the handler should always
> handle it.

I have thought about this again, For now, I did not find any reason to
keep that "if (status & SBSA_GWDT_WCS_WS0)"

So you are right, I should delete it.

and for IRQF_TIMER,  I will delete it.

Thanks for your correction.

>
> Guenter
>



-- 
Best regards,

Fu Wei
Software Engineer
Red Hat Software (Beijing) Co.,Ltd.Shanghai Branch
Ph: +86 21 61221326(direct)
Ph: +86 186 2020 4684 (mobile)
Room 1512, Regus One Corporate Avenue,Level 15,
One Corporate Avenue,222 Hubin Road,Huangpu District,
Shanghai,China 200021
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux