Hi Timur On 29 May 2015 at 21:28, Timur Tabi <timur@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Fu Wei wrote: >>> >>> This should always be true. Instead of reading WCS, I think you should >>> just >>> >panic(). > > >> I thinks I need to confirm it , in case this has been cleaned. > > > I don't see how it's possible for you to receive the interrupt and have WCS > be cleared. It is a SPI, every CPU can get it, But maybe I miss something, but please let me know if other CPU can not get the interrupt. > > -- > Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. > The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the > Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation. -- Best regards, Fu Wei Software Engineer Red Hat Software (Beijing) Co.,Ltd.Shanghai Branch Ph: +86 21 61221326(direct) Ph: +86 186 2020 4684 (mobile) Room 1512, Regus One Corporate Avenue,Level 15, One Corporate Avenue,222 Hubin Road,Huangpu District, Shanghai,China 200021 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
