On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 10:38:32PM +0800, Fu Wei wrote: > Hi Guenter. > > Sorry for my poor English . > let me explain this : > > On 22 May 2015 at 21:23, Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 05/22/2015 03:46 AM, Fu Wei wrote: > >> > >> Hi Timo, > >> > > [ ... ] > > > >> So I am still trying to improve pretimeout support :-) > > > > > > Is there anything still missing from it ? > > > >> If I can make pretimeout merged, may be you can try pretimeout to > >> implement early_timeout_sec function? > > > > > > Not sure how one would or even could do that. > > > > Do you mean "implement early_pretimeout_sec", by any chance ? > > I mean: using pretimeout to implement the function you want, instead > of early_pretimeout_sec > How would this work if the watchdog hardware doesn't support pretimeout ? Pretimeout and early timeout are two logically different functions, with different goals, so I don't entirely (if at all) understand why it would make sense to tie them together. Can you elaborate why you think this would be a good idea ? Thanks, Guenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
