On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 07:30:36PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:16:01AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > lkml.org is being terrible as usual so I can't see half the thread (or > > at least got fed up trying to get it to load) > A part of it is also here: > http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1405.0/00484.html OK, thanks. > > but I think the discussion there petered out more than anything > > else. > Maybe it did :) I think so looking at the archives. > > Or was it the suggestion to make this something that the driver core > > supported so that we didn't have to open code it for every bus? > Probably. That's something I really haven't took the time to look at, > and don't really plan on doing so. > I guess a good way forward would be to revive this patch, and wait for > that generic way to happen. > What do you think of this? Probably best, the Pi bootloader does make it a bit more important. Might also be worth speaking to Greg though.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
