On 26 April 2015 at 12:32, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 11:50:53AM +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>
>> +A spidev example for devicetree binding in a board dts file
>> +&spi2 {
>
> No, this is broken - nothing should ever bind to spidev as spidev. The
> fact that we have a binding document at all is a bug.
And how do you get spidev if nothing binds to it?
When you boot without the binding no device is created.
Thanks
Michal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
