On 12/02/2014 09:01 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
Hi Thor,
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 08:47:41PM +0000, Thor Thayer wrote:
Hi Boris,
On 11/18/2014 02:56 PM, Thor Thayer wrote:
Hi all,
On 11/11/2014 06:14 PM, tthayer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Thor Thayer<tthayer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Adding the device tree entries and bindings needed to support
the Altera L2 cache and On-Chip RAM EDAC. This patch relies upon
an earlier patch to declare and setup On-chip RAM properly.
http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg51117.html
Any comments on these devicetree additions?
Thanks,
Thor
Signed-off-by: Thor Thayer<tthayer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
v2: Remove OCRAM declaration and reference prior patch.
v3-5: No Change
---
I originally submitted this series on November 11, 2014.
I haven't received any comments or ACKs on the device tree patch portion
(patch 5 of 5). According to
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.txt, if the patch
hasn't been Acked after a couple of weeks, the maintainer can pull the
changes if they are comfortable with those changes.
Apologies it has taken so long for this to be looked at. Unfortunately
my inbox is overflowing (as are all of ours) and things fall by the
wayside. I am sorry that this has lead to such a delayed response,
especially given that it was negative.
I'll try to keep up with this a bit more actively.
Thanks,
Mark.
Hi Mark,
Thank you for reviewing this. I have seen how busy the device tree ML is
so I completely understand.
You have reviewed previous patch revisions in this series - thanks. I
thought that I'd addressed most of the issues (in some cases by
explaining my implementation) and since I hadn't heard anything, I
assumed there weren't concerns.
Thanks again,
Thor
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
