On Monday 21 July 2014 07:44:42 Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > >
> > > It would be nice to actually close the device even if someone is
> > > touching screen. Please implement open/close methods and have them set a
> > > flag that you would check here.
> >
> > Ok. I think it's even better to move the request_irq() into the open function,
> > which will avoid the flag and defer the error handling into the actual opening,
> > as well as syncing the running irq with the close function.
>
> I do not quite like acquiring resources needed in open. I think drivers should
> do all resource acquisition in probe() and leave open()/close() to
> activate/quiesce devices.
Ok, I'll move it back then. I'm not sure what I'm supposed to do
in open/close then. Isn't it enough to check info->input->users
like this?
static irqreturn_t exynos_ts_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
{
struct exynos_adc *info = dev_id;
struct iio_dev *dev = dev_get_drvdata(info->dev);
u32 x, y;
bool pressed;
int ret;
while (info->input->users) {
ret = exynos_read_s3c64xx_ts(dev, &x, &y);
if (ret == -ETIMEDOUT)
break;
pressed = x & y & ADC_DATX_PRESSED;
if (!pressed) {
input_report_key(info->input, BTN_TOUCH, 0);
input_sync(info->input);
break;
}
input_report_abs(info->input, ABS_X, x & ADC_DATX_MASK);
input_report_abs(info->input, ABS_Y, y & ADC_DATY_MASK);
input_report_key(info->input, BTN_TOUCH, 1);
input_sync(info->input);
msleep(1);
};
writel(0, ADC_V1_CLRINTPNDNUP(info->regs));
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
I could do enable_irq()/disable_irq(), but that leaves a small
race at startup where we request the irq line and then immediately
disable it again.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
