On Wed, 18 Jun 2014, Boris BREZILLON wrote: > On 18/06/2014 10:36, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Tue, 17 Jun 2014, Boris BREZILLON wrote: > > > >> Add support for the AXP221 PMIC device to the existing AXP20x driver. > >> > >> The AXP221 defines a new set of registers, power supplies and regulators, > >> but most of the API is similar to the AXP20x ones. > >> The AXP20x irq chip definition is reused, though some interrupts are not > >> available in the AXP221. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> drivers/mfd/axp20x.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- > >> include/linux/mfd/axp20x.h | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> 2 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > Looks good to me now. > > Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Can this go in independently to the other patches in the set? > > Yes, as long as no one define an axp221 node in his DT. > In this case axp221 regulators would be considered as axp20x ones (which > might be a bit problematic), because axp20x-regulator driver does not > test the axp variant before probing its regulators (this test is > introduced in patch 3). Then I'd prefer to wait and have the dependencies go in at the same time. Mark, As normal, I'm happy to create a shared branch between us. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
