On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 7:32 PM, Ley Foon Tan <lftan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 12:09 AM, Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> +/* Additional Nios II specific syscalls. */
>>> +#define __NR_cacheflush (__NR_arch_specific_syscall)
>>> +__SYSCALL(__NR_cacheflush, sys_cacheflush)
>>
>> I guess you should Cc: Michael Kerrisk on this one.
> CC him this email.
>
>>
>> Also... explanation why you need this syscall while other
>> architectures live happily without it would be nice.
> This syscall exist in nios2 port since old days and some users already
> used it for sometimes.
> Like mentioned by Greet, 12 our of 28 architectures provide such a syscall.
>
>>> +/* sys_cacheflush -- flush the processor cache. */
>>> +asmlinkage int sys_cacheflush(unsigned long addr, unsigned long len,
>>> + unsigned int op)
>>> +{
>>> + struct vm_area_struct *vma;
>>> +
>>> + if (len == 0)
>>> + return 0;
>>
>> op is being ignored? You should remove it... or if (op) return -EINVAL
>> if you want future extensions.
> Yes, op argument is being ignored. Okay, will add the return -EINVAL
> if op is non-zero.
Be careful. If existing applications already use this and maybe pass a
dummy value
to it you break them.
--
Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
