Hi Brian, On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 02:05:00AM +0000, Austin, Brian wrote: > > > >> On Mar 11, 2014, at 13:46, "Mark Brown" <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 04:55:58PM +0100, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > >> On 03/11/2014 04:41 PM, Brian Austin wrote: > > > >>> So WRT the CS42888, this is one device in a series of 2 devices that are > >>> register compatible with the only difference being that the CS42488 has 2 > >>> extra ADC's. Same die and same DeviceID. > > > >>> Would it make more sense to submit the driver with the extra ADC's to make > >>> it feature complete for both devices? Wouldn't be odd to have 2 drivers that > >>> do the same for 98% of the code. > > > >> This should be in one driver. But support for the second device can > >> always be added in a follow up patch. > > > > Yes, we can add support later. It might be helpful to name the driver > > with some generic name I guess. > CS42xx8 would work. > > We have a CS42448 and the CS42888. The difference is the 2 extra ADC's on the CS42448. I can add those later. > > I still would like to go over some of the v2 code though before a v3 is sent. Actually I've already sent v3 right after this v2 due to some doc updating. Anyway, I'd love to wait for your comments against the patch before I send v3. Thank you, Nicolin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
