>> On Mar 11, 2014, at 13:46, "Mark Brown" <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 04:55:58PM +0100, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: >> On 03/11/2014 04:41 PM, Brian Austin wrote: > >>> So WRT the CS42888, this is one device in a series of 2 devices that are >>> register compatible with the only difference being that the CS42488 has 2 >>> extra ADC's. Same die and same DeviceID. > >>> Would it make more sense to submit the driver with the extra ADC's to make >>> it feature complete for both devices? Wouldn't be odd to have 2 drivers that >>> do the same for 98% of the code. > >> This should be in one driver. But support for the second device can >> always be added in a follow up patch. > > Yes, we can add support later. It might be helpful to name the driver > with some generic name I guess. CS42xx8 would work. We have a CS42448 and the CS42888. The difference is the 2 extra ADC's on the CS42448. I can add those later. I still would like to go over some of the v2 code though before a v3 is sent. Thanks Brian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
