Hi Kishon, [...] >>>>>>>>>>>> Right. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> While 3.0 block(PIPE3) can be used for Super Speed, 2.0 >>>>>>>>>>>> block(UTMI+) >>>>>>>>>>>> can be used for High speed. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> It should then come under *single IP muliple PHY* category similar >>>>>>>>>>> to what >>>>>>>>>>> Sylwester has done. [...] >> >> The idea is to model the driver as close to the hardware though I understand >> there won't be any advantages w.r.t power or performance. maybe in later >> versions of the IP we'll have separate bits to control usb3 and usb2. > > Ok, i will prepare the next patchset for separating out the possible > code based on > the UTMI+ or PIPE3 phys. Though when experimenting with the PHY > settings i can see > there's little of such code :-) > >> >> I think for power control we should have both usb3 and usb2 power-on callback >> calling a single function that controls the power bit. > Right. I will do that. Have posted the next version of patch with functionality to support multiple PHYs as suggested. Please review the same. Thanks !! -- Best Regards Vivek Gautam Samsung R&D Institute, Bangalore India -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
