Re: [PATCH net-next v4 8/8] bnxt_en: add support for device memory tcp

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 9:16 AM David Wei <dw@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 2024-11-01 11:24, Taehee Yoo wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 1, 2024 at 11:53 PM Mina Almasry <almasrymina@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 9:25 AM Taehee Yoo <ap420073@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Currently, bnxt_en driver satisfies the requirements of Device memory
> >>> TCP, which is tcp-data-split.
> >>> So, it implements Device memory TCP for bnxt_en driver.
> >>>
> >>> From now on, the aggregation ring handles netmem_ref instead of page
> >>> regardless of the on/off of netmem.
> >>> So, for the aggregation ring, memory will be handled with the netmem
> >>> page_pool API instead of generic page_pool API.
> >>>
> >>> If Devmem is enabled, netmem_ref is used as-is and if Devmem is not
> >>> enabled, netmem_ref will be converted to page and that is used.
> >>>
> >>> Driver recognizes whether the devmem is set or unset based on the
> >>> mp_params.mp_priv is not NULL.
> >>> Only if devmem is set, it passes PP_FLAG_ALLOW_UNREADABLE_NETMEM.
> >>
> >> Looks like in the latest version, you pass
> >> PP_FLAG_ALLOW_UNREADABLE_NETMEM unconditionally, so this line is
> >> obsolete.
> >
> > Okay, I will remove this line.
> >
> >>
> >> However, I think you should only pass PP_FLAG_ALLOW_UNREADABLE_NETMEM
> >> if hds_thresh==0 and tcp-data-split==1, because otherwise the driver
> >> is not configured well enough to handle unreadable netmem, right? I
> >> know that we added checks in the devmem binding to detect hds_thresh
> >> and tcp-data-split, but we should keep another layer of protection in
> >> the driver. The driver should not set PP_FLAG_ALLOW_UNREADABLE_NETMEM
> >> unless it's configured to be able to handle unreadable netmem.
> >
> > Okay, I agree, I will pass PP_FLAG_ALLOW_UNREADABLE_NETMEM
> > only when hds_thresh==0 and tcp-data-split==1.
> >
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Tested-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>> ---
> >>>
> >>> v4:
> >>>  - Do not select NET_DEVMEM in Kconfig.
> >>>  - Pass PP_FLAG_ALLOW_UNREADABLE_NETMEM flag unconditionally.
> >>>  - Add __bnxt_rx_agg_pages_xdp().
> >>>  - Use gfp flag in __bnxt_alloc_rx_netmem().
> >>>  - Do not add *offset in the __bnxt_alloc_rx_netmem().
> >>>  - Do not pass queue_idx to bnxt_alloc_rx_page_pool().
> >>>  - Add Test tag from Stanislav.
> >>>  - Add page_pool_recycle_direct_netmem() helper.
> >>>
> >>> v3:
> >>>  - Patch added.
> >>>
> >>>  drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c | 182 ++++++++++++++++------
> >>>  drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.h |   2 +-
> >>>  include/net/page_pool/helpers.h           |   6 +
> >>>  3 files changed, 142 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
>
> Hi Taehee, what is your plan with this patch? Are you still working on
> it? I noticed that you dropped it in later versions of this series. With
> io_uring zero copy Rx now merged I also need bnxt support, but I don't
> want to duplicate efforts. Please let me know, thanks!

Hi David,
Sorry for the late! I'm still working on it.
I implemented a working patch, but there are several bugs.
So I'm thinking about how to deal with it.
And then, I would like to send this patch after fixing bugs.

Thanks a lot!
Taehee Yoo





[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux