Re: [PATCH net-next v4 8/8] bnxt_en: add support for device memory tcp

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 9:25 AM Taehee Yoo <ap420073@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Currently, bnxt_en driver satisfies the requirements of Device memory
> TCP, which is tcp-data-split.
> So, it implements Device memory TCP for bnxt_en driver.
>
> From now on, the aggregation ring handles netmem_ref instead of page
> regardless of the on/off of netmem.
> So, for the aggregation ring, memory will be handled with the netmem
> page_pool API instead of generic page_pool API.
>
> If Devmem is enabled, netmem_ref is used as-is and if Devmem is not
> enabled, netmem_ref will be converted to page and that is used.
>
> Driver recognizes whether the devmem is set or unset based on the
> mp_params.mp_priv is not NULL.
> Only if devmem is set, it passes PP_FLAG_ALLOW_UNREADABLE_NETMEM.

Looks like in the latest version, you pass
PP_FLAG_ALLOW_UNREADABLE_NETMEM unconditionally, so this line is
obsolete.

However, I think you should only pass PP_FLAG_ALLOW_UNREADABLE_NETMEM
if hds_thresh==0 and tcp-data-split==1, because otherwise the driver
is not configured well enough to handle unreadable netmem, right? I
know that we added checks in the devmem binding to detect hds_thresh
and tcp-data-split, but we should keep another layer of protection in
the driver. The driver should not set PP_FLAG_ALLOW_UNREADABLE_NETMEM
unless it's configured to be able to handle unreadable netmem.

>
> Tested-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> v4:
>  - Do not select NET_DEVMEM in Kconfig.
>  - Pass PP_FLAG_ALLOW_UNREADABLE_NETMEM flag unconditionally.
>  - Add __bnxt_rx_agg_pages_xdp().
>  - Use gfp flag in __bnxt_alloc_rx_netmem().
>  - Do not add *offset in the __bnxt_alloc_rx_netmem().
>  - Do not pass queue_idx to bnxt_alloc_rx_page_pool().
>  - Add Test tag from Stanislav.
>  - Add page_pool_recycle_direct_netmem() helper.
>
> v3:
>  - Patch added.
>
>  drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c | 182 ++++++++++++++++------
>  drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.h |   2 +-
>  include/net/page_pool/helpers.h           |   6 +
>  3 files changed, 142 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
> index 7d9da483b867..7924b1da0413 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
> @@ -55,6 +55,7 @@
>  #include <net/page_pool/helpers.h>
>  #include <linux/align.h>
>  #include <net/netdev_queues.h>
> +#include <net/netdev_rx_queue.h>
>
>  #include "bnxt_hsi.h"
>  #include "bnxt.h"
> @@ -863,6 +864,22 @@ static void bnxt_tx_int(struct bnxt *bp, struct bnxt_napi *bnapi, int budget)
>                 bnapi->events &= ~BNXT_TX_CMP_EVENT;
>  }
>
> +static netmem_ref __bnxt_alloc_rx_netmem(struct bnxt *bp, dma_addr_t *mapping,
> +                                        struct bnxt_rx_ring_info *rxr,
> +                                        unsigned int *offset,
> +                                        gfp_t gfp)
> +{
> +       netmem_ref netmem;
> +
> +       netmem = page_pool_alloc_netmem(rxr->page_pool, gfp);
> +       if (!netmem)
> +               return 0;
> +       *offset = 0;
> +
> +       *mapping = page_pool_get_dma_addr_netmem(netmem);
> +       return netmem;
> +}
> +
>  static struct page *__bnxt_alloc_rx_page(struct bnxt *bp, dma_addr_t *mapping,
>                                          struct bnxt_rx_ring_info *rxr,
>                                          unsigned int *offset,
> @@ -972,21 +989,21 @@ static inline u16 bnxt_find_next_agg_idx(struct bnxt_rx_ring_info *rxr, u16 idx)
>         return next;
>  }
>
> -static inline int bnxt_alloc_rx_page(struct bnxt *bp,
> -                                    struct bnxt_rx_ring_info *rxr,
> -                                    u16 prod, gfp_t gfp)
> +static inline int bnxt_alloc_rx_netmem(struct bnxt *bp,
> +                                      struct bnxt_rx_ring_info *rxr,
> +                                      u16 prod, gfp_t gfp)
>  {
>         struct rx_bd *rxbd =
>                 &rxr->rx_agg_desc_ring[RX_AGG_RING(bp, prod)][RX_IDX(prod)];
>         struct bnxt_sw_rx_agg_bd *rx_agg_buf;
> -       struct page *page;
> -       dma_addr_t mapping;
>         u16 sw_prod = rxr->rx_sw_agg_prod;
>         unsigned int offset = 0;
> +       dma_addr_t mapping;
> +       netmem_ref netmem;
>
> -       page = __bnxt_alloc_rx_page(bp, &mapping, rxr, &offset, gfp);
> +       netmem = __bnxt_alloc_rx_netmem(bp, &mapping, rxr, &offset, gfp);
>
> -       if (!page)
> +       if (!netmem)
>                 return -ENOMEM;
>
>         if (unlikely(test_bit(sw_prod, rxr->rx_agg_bmap)))
> @@ -996,7 +1013,7 @@ static inline int bnxt_alloc_rx_page(struct bnxt *bp,
>         rx_agg_buf = &rxr->rx_agg_ring[sw_prod];
>         rxr->rx_sw_agg_prod = RING_RX_AGG(bp, NEXT_RX_AGG(sw_prod));
>
> -       rx_agg_buf->page = page;
> +       rx_agg_buf->netmem = netmem;
>         rx_agg_buf->offset = offset;
>         rx_agg_buf->mapping = mapping;
>         rxbd->rx_bd_haddr = cpu_to_le64(mapping);
> @@ -1044,7 +1061,7 @@ static void bnxt_reuse_rx_agg_bufs(struct bnxt_cp_ring_info *cpr, u16 idx,
>                 struct rx_agg_cmp *agg;
>                 struct bnxt_sw_rx_agg_bd *cons_rx_buf, *prod_rx_buf;
>                 struct rx_bd *prod_bd;
> -               struct page *page;
> +               netmem_ref netmem;
>
>                 if (p5_tpa)
>                         agg = bnxt_get_tpa_agg_p5(bp, rxr, idx, start + i);
> @@ -1061,11 +1078,11 @@ static void bnxt_reuse_rx_agg_bufs(struct bnxt_cp_ring_info *cpr, u16 idx,
>                 cons_rx_buf = &rxr->rx_agg_ring[cons];
>
>                 /* It is possible for sw_prod to be equal to cons, so
> -                * set cons_rx_buf->page to NULL first.
> +                * set cons_rx_buf->netmem to 0 first.
>                  */
> -               page = cons_rx_buf->page;
> -               cons_rx_buf->page = NULL;
> -               prod_rx_buf->page = page;
> +               netmem = cons_rx_buf->netmem;
> +               cons_rx_buf->netmem = 0;
> +               prod_rx_buf->netmem = netmem;
>                 prod_rx_buf->offset = cons_rx_buf->offset;
>
>                 prod_rx_buf->mapping = cons_rx_buf->mapping;
> @@ -1190,29 +1207,104 @@ static struct sk_buff *bnxt_rx_skb(struct bnxt *bp,
>         return skb;
>  }
>
> -static u32 __bnxt_rx_agg_pages(struct bnxt *bp,
> -                              struct bnxt_cp_ring_info *cpr,
> -                              struct skb_shared_info *shinfo,
> -                              u16 idx, u32 agg_bufs, bool tpa,
> -                              struct xdp_buff *xdp)
> +static bool __bnxt_rx_agg_pages_skb(struct bnxt *bp,
> +                                   struct bnxt_cp_ring_info *cpr,
> +                                   struct sk_buff *skb,
> +                                   u16 idx, u32 agg_bufs, bool tpa)
>  {

To be honest I could not immediately understand why
__bnxt_rx_agg_pages needed to be split into __bnxt_rx_agg_pages_skb
and __bnxt_rx_agg_pages_xdp.

Fundamentally speaking we wanted the netmem transition to be as smooth
and low-churn as possible for drivers. The only big changes in this
patch are the split between skb and xdp. That points to a problem in
the design of netmem maybe.

For xdp, core makes sure that if xdp is enabled on the device, then
the netmem is always pages (never unreadable). So I think netmem
should be able to handle xdp as well as skb. Can you give more details
on why the split?

>         struct bnxt_napi *bnapi = cpr->bnapi;
>         struct pci_dev *pdev = bp->pdev;
> -       struct bnxt_rx_ring_info *rxr = bnapi->rx_ring;
> -       u16 prod = rxr->rx_agg_prod;
> +       struct bnxt_rx_ring_info *rxr;
>         u32 i, total_frag_len = 0;
>         bool p5_tpa = false;
> +       u16 prod;
> +
> +       rxr = bnapi->rx_ring;
> +       prod = rxr->rx_agg_prod;
>
>         if ((bp->flags & BNXT_FLAG_CHIP_P5_PLUS) && tpa)
>                 p5_tpa = true;
>
>         for (i = 0; i < agg_bufs; i++) {
> -               skb_frag_t *frag = &shinfo->frags[i];
> -               u16 cons, frag_len;
> +               struct bnxt_sw_rx_agg_bd *cons_rx_buf;
>                 struct rx_agg_cmp *agg;
> +               u16 cons, frag_len;
> +               dma_addr_t mapping;
> +               netmem_ref netmem;
> +
> +               if (p5_tpa)
> +                       agg = bnxt_get_tpa_agg_p5(bp, rxr, idx, i);
> +               else
> +                       agg = bnxt_get_agg(bp, cpr, idx, i);
> +               cons = agg->rx_agg_cmp_opaque;
> +               frag_len = (le32_to_cpu(agg->rx_agg_cmp_len_flags_type) &
> +                           RX_AGG_CMP_LEN) >> RX_AGG_CMP_LEN_SHIFT;
> +
> +               cons_rx_buf = &rxr->rx_agg_ring[cons];
> +               skb_add_rx_frag_netmem(skb, i, cons_rx_buf->netmem,
> +                                      cons_rx_buf->offset, frag_len,
> +                                      BNXT_RX_PAGE_SIZE);
> +               __clear_bit(cons, rxr->rx_agg_bmap);
> +
> +               /* It is possible for bnxt_alloc_rx_netmem() to allocate
> +                * a sw_prod index that equals the cons index, so we
> +                * need to clear the cons entry now.
> +                */
> +               mapping = cons_rx_buf->mapping;
> +               netmem = cons_rx_buf->netmem;
> +               cons_rx_buf->netmem = 0;
> +
> +               if (bnxt_alloc_rx_netmem(bp, rxr, prod, GFP_ATOMIC) != 0) {
> +                       skb->len -= frag_len;
> +                       skb->data_len -= frag_len;
> +                       skb->truesize -= BNXT_RX_PAGE_SIZE;
> +                       --skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags;
> +                       cons_rx_buf->netmem = netmem;
> +
> +                       /* Update prod since possibly some pages have been
> +                        * allocated already.
> +                        */
> +                       rxr->rx_agg_prod = prod;
> +                       bnxt_reuse_rx_agg_bufs(cpr, idx, i, agg_bufs - i, tpa);
> +                       return 0;
> +               }
> +
> +               dma_sync_single_for_cpu(&pdev->dev, mapping, BNXT_RX_PAGE_SIZE,
> +                                       bp->rx_dir);
> +

You should probably use page_pool_dma_sync_for_cpu. I'm merging a
change to make that function skip dma-syncing for net_iov:

https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20241029204541.1301203-5-almasrymina@xxxxxxxxxx/

Which is necessary following Jason Gunthorpe's guidance.

> +               total_frag_len += frag_len;
> +               prod = NEXT_RX_AGG(prod);
> +       }
> +       rxr->rx_agg_prod = prod;
> +       return total_frag_len;
> +}
> +
> +static u32 __bnxt_rx_agg_pages_xdp(struct bnxt *bp,
> +                                  struct bnxt_cp_ring_info *cpr,
> +                                  struct skb_shared_info *shinfo,
> +                                  u16 idx, u32 agg_bufs, bool tpa,
> +                                  struct xdp_buff *xdp)
> +{
> +       struct bnxt_napi *bnapi = cpr->bnapi;
> +       struct pci_dev *pdev = bp->pdev;
> +       struct bnxt_rx_ring_info *rxr;
> +       u32 i, total_frag_len = 0;
> +       bool p5_tpa = false;
> +       u16 prod;
> +
> +       rxr = bnapi->rx_ring;
> +       prod = rxr->rx_agg_prod;
> +
> +       if ((bp->flags & BNXT_FLAG_CHIP_P5_PLUS) && tpa)
> +               p5_tpa = true;
> +
> +       for (i = 0; i < agg_bufs; i++) {
>                 struct bnxt_sw_rx_agg_bd *cons_rx_buf;
> -               struct page *page;
> +               skb_frag_t *frag = &shinfo->frags[i];
> +               struct rx_agg_cmp *agg;
> +               u16 cons, frag_len;
>                 dma_addr_t mapping;
> +               netmem_ref netmem;
>
>                 if (p5_tpa)
>                         agg = bnxt_get_tpa_agg_p5(bp, rxr, idx, i);
> @@ -1223,9 +1315,10 @@ static u32 __bnxt_rx_agg_pages(struct bnxt *bp,
>                             RX_AGG_CMP_LEN) >> RX_AGG_CMP_LEN_SHIFT;
>
>                 cons_rx_buf = &rxr->rx_agg_ring[cons];
> -               skb_frag_fill_page_desc(frag, cons_rx_buf->page,
> -                                       cons_rx_buf->offset, frag_len);
> +               skb_frag_fill_netmem_desc(frag, cons_rx_buf->netmem,
> +                                         cons_rx_buf->offset, frag_len);
>                 shinfo->nr_frags = i + 1;
> +
>                 __clear_bit(cons, rxr->rx_agg_bmap);
>
>                 /* It is possible for bnxt_alloc_rx_page() to allocate
> @@ -1233,15 +1326,15 @@ static u32 __bnxt_rx_agg_pages(struct bnxt *bp,
>                  * need to clear the cons entry now.
>                  */
>                 mapping = cons_rx_buf->mapping;
> -               page = cons_rx_buf->page;
> -               cons_rx_buf->page = NULL;
> +               netmem = cons_rx_buf->netmem;
> +               cons_rx_buf->netmem = 0;
>
> -               if (xdp && page_is_pfmemalloc(page))
> +               if (netmem_is_pfmemalloc(netmem))
>                         xdp_buff_set_frag_pfmemalloc(xdp);
>
> -               if (bnxt_alloc_rx_page(bp, rxr, prod, GFP_ATOMIC) != 0) {
> +               if (bnxt_alloc_rx_netmem(bp, rxr, prod, GFP_ATOMIC) != 0) {
>                         --shinfo->nr_frags;
> -                       cons_rx_buf->page = page;
> +                       cons_rx_buf->netmem = netmem;
>
>                         /* Update prod since possibly some pages have been
>                          * allocated already.
> @@ -1266,20 +1359,12 @@ static struct sk_buff *bnxt_rx_agg_pages_skb(struct bnxt *bp,
>                                              struct sk_buff *skb, u16 idx,
>                                              u32 agg_bufs, bool tpa)
>  {
> -       struct skb_shared_info *shinfo = skb_shinfo(skb);
> -       u32 total_frag_len = 0;
> -
> -       total_frag_len = __bnxt_rx_agg_pages(bp, cpr, shinfo, idx,
> -                                            agg_bufs, tpa, NULL);
> -       if (!total_frag_len) {
> +       if (!__bnxt_rx_agg_pages_skb(bp, cpr, skb, idx, agg_bufs, tpa)) {
>                 skb_mark_for_recycle(skb);
>                 dev_kfree_skb(skb);
>                 return NULL;
>         }
>
> -       skb->data_len += total_frag_len;
> -       skb->len += total_frag_len;
> -       skb->truesize += BNXT_RX_PAGE_SIZE * agg_bufs;
>         return skb;
>  }
>
> @@ -1294,8 +1379,8 @@ static u32 bnxt_rx_agg_pages_xdp(struct bnxt *bp,
>         if (!xdp_buff_has_frags(xdp))
>                 shinfo->nr_frags = 0;
>
> -       total_frag_len = __bnxt_rx_agg_pages(bp, cpr, shinfo,
> -                                            idx, agg_bufs, tpa, xdp);
> +       total_frag_len = __bnxt_rx_agg_pages_xdp(bp, cpr, shinfo,
> +                                                idx, agg_bufs, tpa, xdp);
>         if (total_frag_len) {
>                 xdp_buff_set_frags_flag(xdp);
>                 shinfo->nr_frags = agg_bufs;
> @@ -3341,15 +3426,15 @@ static void bnxt_free_one_rx_agg_ring(struct bnxt *bp, struct bnxt_rx_ring_info
>
>         for (i = 0; i < max_idx; i++) {
>                 struct bnxt_sw_rx_agg_bd *rx_agg_buf = &rxr->rx_agg_ring[i];
> -               struct page *page = rx_agg_buf->page;
> +               netmem_ref netmem = rx_agg_buf->netmem;
>
> -               if (!page)
> +               if (!netmem)
>                         continue;
>
> -               rx_agg_buf->page = NULL;
> +               rx_agg_buf->netmem = 0;
>                 __clear_bit(i, rxr->rx_agg_bmap);
>
> -               page_pool_recycle_direct(rxr->page_pool, page);
> +               page_pool_recycle_direct_netmem(rxr->page_pool, netmem);
>         }
>  }
>
> @@ -3620,7 +3705,10 @@ static int bnxt_alloc_rx_page_pool(struct bnxt *bp,
>         pp.dev = &bp->pdev->dev;
>         pp.dma_dir = bp->rx_dir;
>         pp.max_len = PAGE_SIZE;
> -       pp.flags = PP_FLAG_DMA_MAP | PP_FLAG_DMA_SYNC_DEV;
> +       pp.flags = PP_FLAG_DMA_MAP | PP_FLAG_DMA_SYNC_DEV |
> +                  PP_FLAG_ALLOW_UNREADABLE_NETMEM;

PP_FLAG_ALLOW_UNREADABLE_NETMEM should only be set when the driver can
handle unreadable netmem. I.e. when hds_thresh==0 and
tcp-data-split==1.


-- 
Thanks,
Mina





[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux