On Wed, Feb 5, 2025 at 2:57 PM Zhi Wang <zhiw@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > It would be also helpful to make the process explicit. E.g. sharing your > command lines used to checking the patches. So folks can align with the > expected outcome, e.g. command line parameters. These two guidelines (and generally the few others above) are intended to apply to all Rust code in the kernel (i.e. not just `rust/`) -- their command lines are mentioned in `Documentation/rust/`. We could add a note to make that clearer if that helps. So I would suggest avoiding repetition here by referencing those. We also mention it in our "Subsystem Profile document" at https://rust-for-linux.com/contributing#submit-checklist-addendum. > > +The availability of proper documentation is essential in terms of scalability, > > +accessability for new contributors and maintainability of a project in general, Typo: accessibility? Cheers, Miguel
