On Thu, 9 Jan 2025 19:59:20 +0000 Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 09, 2025 at 11:51:41AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > On Thu, 9 Jan 2025 17:49:42 +0100 Kory Maincent wrote: > > > > I think I should only drop patch 11 and 12 from this series which add > > > something new while the rest is reshuffle or fix code. > > > I mentioned 13 & 14 because I suspected we may need to wait for > > the maintainers of regulator, and merge 13 in some special way. > > Looks like Mark merged 13 already, so 🤷️ Yes, Mark is really responsive! Tomorrow I will send a new version without the regulator patch and the PSE device index support. > Well, you were saying that the subdevice structure didn't make sense and > you wanted to see it dropped for now so given that it's -rc6 and it's > unlikely that'll get fixed for this release it made sense to just apply > the regulator bit for now and get myself off these huge threads. > > There's no direct dependency here so it should be fine to merge the > networking stuff separately if that does get sorted out. Thanks Mark for taking the patch! About the following two patches do you prefer to let them in the future budget evaluation strategy support net series or should I send them directly in regulator tree? https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20250103-feature_poe_port_prio-v4-17-dc91a3c0c187@xxxxxxxxxxx/ https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20250103-feature_poe_port_prio-v4-18-dc91a3c0c187@xxxxxxxxxxx/ If I send them in regulator tree do you think it would be doable to have them accepted before the merge window. I will resend them with the fixes asked by Krzysztof (convert miniwatt to milliwatt). Regards, -- Köry Maincent, Bootlin Embedded Linux and kernel engineering https://bootlin.com
