On Thu, 9 Jan 2025 17:27:03 +0100 Oleksij Rempel wrote: > > > This index is not used in the series, I see later on you'll add power > > > evaluation strategy but that also seems to be within a domain not > > > device? > > > > > > Doesn't it make sense to move patches 11-14 to the next series? > > > The other 11 patches seem to my untrained eye to reshuffle existing > > > stuff, so they would make sense as a cohesive series. > > > > Indeed PSE index is used only as user information but there is nothing > > correlated. You are right maybe we can add PSE index when we have something > > usable for it. Oh, maybe you want to do the devlink-y thing then? Devlink identifies its devices by what I'd call "sysfs name" - bus name and device name. This is more meaningful to user than an artificial ID. Downside is it won't work well if you have multiple objects under a single struct device, or multiple struct device for one ASIC (e.g. multiple PCIe PFs on one PCIe card) > No user, means, it is not exposed to the user space, it is not about > actual user space users. Can't parse this :)
