On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 12:39:50PM +0200, Heikki Krogerus wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 09:54:26AM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 04:27:26PM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote: > > > On 10/16/2013 04:10 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: > > > Do you know if there are users of dwc3 other than exynos5250 and omap5? > > > If not, we should get rid of the old USB PHY altogether. > > > > Intel's Baytrail, at least. But they don't use DT. > > I don't see any use for the generic-phy when the device is enumerated > from PCI. If dwc3 can live without phys, there should not be any > problem dropping the old USB PHY support. yeah, I don't want to drop PHY support, I want to require everybody to provide a PHY, otherwise we have too many options to handle and that's never clean. -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
