Hi, On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 09:54:26AM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote: > On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 04:27:26PM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote: > > On 10/16/2013 04:10 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: > > Do you know if there are users of dwc3 other than exynos5250 and omap5? > > If not, we should get rid of the old USB PHY altogether. > > Intel's Baytrail, at least. But they don't use DT. I don't see any use for the generic-phy when the device is enumerated from PCI. If dwc3 can live without phys, there should not be any problem dropping the old USB PHY support. Br, -- heikki -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
