Re: [PATCH 2/4] MFD: TPS65218: Add driver for the TPS65218 PMIC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday 03 December 2013 02:54 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
The TPS65218 chip is a power management IC for Portable Navigation Systems
and Tablet Computing devices. It contains the following components:

  - Regulators.
  - Over Temperature warning and Shut down.

This patch adds support for tps65218 mfd device. At this time only
the regulator functionality is made available.

Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@xxxxxx>
---
  drivers/mfd/Kconfig          |   14 ++
  drivers/mfd/Makefile         |    1 +
  drivers/mfd/tps65218.c       |  281 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  include/linux/mfd/tps65218.h |  288 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
<snip>

+config MFD_TPS65218
+	tristate "TI TPS65218 Power Management chips"
+	depends on I2C
+	select MFD_CORE
+	select REGMAP_I2C
+	help
+	  If you say yes here you get support for the TPS65218 series of
+	  Power Management chips.
+	  These include voltage regulators, gpio and other features
+	  that are often used in portable devices.
Perhaps you should add a note that only the regulator component is
currently supported.
Ok. I will add it.

<snip>

new file mode 100644
index 0000000..8c61640
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/mfd/tps65218.c
@@ -0,0 +1,281 @@
+/*
+ * TPS65218 chip family multi-function driver
Instead of calling it an MFD driver (is there such a thing?) I think
you should mention its true purpose, as per the datasheet.

Ok.


<snip>

+static const struct of_device_id of_tps65218_match_table[] = {
+	{ .compatible = "ti,tps65218", },
+	{ /* end */ }
I think the end comment is superfluous.

However, if you _really_ want to put something in there, I dislike
"/* Sentinel */" the least.

I will remove it.

+static int tps65218_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
+				const struct i2c_device_id *ids)
+{
<snip>

+	ret = of_platform_populate(client->dev.of_node, NULL, NULL,
+				   &client->dev);
What are you trying to do here?

Register each regulator as a platform device?

Yeah. The probe will be called for every regulator separately.

<snip>

+static const struct i2c_device_id tps65218_id_table[] = {
+	{"tps65218", TPS65218},
+};
This has a different structure to of_tps65218_match_table, please
ensure they're the same. I prefer spaces after '{' and before '}'.

Ok. I will add a space after '{' and before '}'. Sorry I did not
follow tps65218_id_table being different than of_tps65218_match_table.

One is of the type of_device_id and the other i2c_device_id.

<snip>


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux