Re: [PATCH 2/4] MFD: TPS65218: Add driver for the TPS65218 PMIC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> The TPS65218 chip is a power management IC for Portable Navigation Systems
> and Tablet Computing devices. It contains the following components:
> 
>  - Regulators.
>  - Over Temperature warning and Shut down.
> 
> This patch adds support for tps65218 mfd device. At this time only
> the regulator functionality is made available.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@xxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/mfd/Kconfig          |   14 ++
>  drivers/mfd/Makefile         |    1 +
>  drivers/mfd/tps65218.c       |  281 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/mfd/tps65218.h |  288 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

<snip>

> +config MFD_TPS65218
> +	tristate "TI TPS65218 Power Management chips"
> +	depends on I2C
> +	select MFD_CORE
> +	select REGMAP_I2C
> +	help
> +	  If you say yes here you get support for the TPS65218 series of
> +	  Power Management chips.
> +	  These include voltage regulators, gpio and other features
> +	  that are often used in portable devices.

Perhaps you should add a note that only the regulator component is
currently supported.

<snip>

> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..8c61640
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/tps65218.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,281 @@
> +/*
> + * TPS65218 chip family multi-function driver

Instead of calling it an MFD driver (is there such a thing?) I think
you should mention its true purpose, as per the datasheet.

<snip>

> +static const struct of_device_id of_tps65218_match_table[] = {
> +	{ .compatible = "ti,tps65218", },
> +	{ /* end */ }

I think the end comment is superfluous.

However, if you _really_ want to put something in there, I dislike
"/* Sentinel */" the least.

> +static int tps65218_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> +				const struct i2c_device_id *ids)
> +{

<snip>

> +	ret = of_platform_populate(client->dev.of_node, NULL, NULL,
> +				   &client->dev);

What are you trying to do here?

Register each regulator as a platform device?

<snip>

> +static const struct i2c_device_id tps65218_id_table[] = {
> +	{"tps65218", TPS65218},
> +};

This has a different structure to of_tps65218_match_table, please
ensure they're the same. I prefer spaces after '{' and before '}'.

<snip>

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux