On Monday 18 November 2013, Belisko Marek wrote: > > It would be far nicer for the device binding to just have the interrupts > > property, and for the gpio controller to act as an interrupt-controller, > > with the appropriate pin management. > OK. Can you please give me some example in current bindings tree? > Something like in: > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fb/mxsfb.txt ? So if I understand > correctly we define only property > interrupts = <xxx> which will be exact interrupt number for cpu gpio > connected to bmp085 irq line. > > See Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/8xxx_gpio.txt for an example of a device whose interrupt line is connected to a gpio controller. The key here is to set the "interrupt-parent" to the gpio node and have the irq specifier define an interrupt local to that node. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
