On 9/14/24 9:25 AM, Dongliang Mu wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 9:22 AM Alex Shi <seakeel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 9/11/24 9:29 PM, Dongliang Mu wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 6:11 PM Alex Shi <seakeel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> Hi Dongliang:
>>>>
>>>> In scripts/checktransupdate.py,
>>>> def get_origin_path(file_path):
>>>> paths = file_path.split("/")
>>>> tidx = paths.index("translations")
>>>> opaths = paths[:tidx]
>>>> opaths += paths[tidx + 2 :]
>>>> return "/".join(opaths)
>>> cc +ziqiu
>>>
>>> Could you take a look at this function?
>>>
>>>> It use a different way instead of the ':Original:' line to find out the origin file.
>>>> That may cause file finding failed if we have a different dir map for translation.
>>> Yes, this is more reasonable. BTW, is this enforced in the Chinese or
>>> other language translation?
>> It should be used in all language.
> Hi Alex,
>
> Why can't I find this thread in the LKML? We have cc-ed the linux-doc
> mailing list.
>
> Jon has different ideas about this origin file finding.
Hi Dongliang,
I just copy to linux-doc, not lkml. but Jon could see the thread in linux-doc too. He reply there may just because more people in LKML. :)
As to his and others' comments want to do further check, to confirm if the Original file exists. That further checking make sense too, and could be easy to add, isn't it?
Thanks
Alex
>
>>>> Yes, we have no worry since all of them are same. But could we take the ':Original:' usage for a possible dir map changes?
>>> Yeah, at least we can take the current method as backup for original
>>> file location.
>> good idea!
>>
>>>> Anyway, just a quick idea.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Alex
>>>>
