Hi Grygorii, On Wednesday 06 November 2013 05:03 PM, Grygorii Strashko wrote: > Hi Sekhar, Linus, > > On 11/06/2013 12:49 PM, Sekhar Nori wrote: >> On Wednesday 06 November 2013 03:45 PM, Prabhakar Lad wrote: >>> Hi Linus, >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Linus Walleij >>> <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Prabhakar Lad >>>> <prabhakar.csengg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Linus Walleij >>>>> <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>> On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Lad, Prabhakar >>>>>> <prabhakar.csengg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This patch fixes the check for the offset in >>>>>>> gpio_to_irq_unbanked() function. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>>> >>>>>> Is this a regression that should go in right now? >>>>>> >>>>> Yes it needs too. >>>> >>>> But on top of *what* exactly? >>>> >>>> This does not apply to my gpio tree devel branch and >>>> not even on the mainline kernel. >>>> >>> Looks like this needs to go via ARM tree as the earlier >>> patches have gone via ARM tree itself [1]. >>> If you can ACK it Sekhar can get it in via ARM tree. >> >> The dependent patches are all in linux-next through ARM SoC queued for >> v3.13 merge. This fix can either be sent late in merge cycle once Linus >> has pulled ARM SoC or after v3.13-rc1 comes out. > > Pls, wait a bit - this fix is incomplete :( The below changes have to be > done too: Can either you or Prabhakar send a separate patch (series) with only the fixes? Thanks, Sekhar -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
