On Wednesday 06 November 2013 03:45 PM, Prabhakar Lad wrote: > Hi Linus, > > On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Prabhakar Lad >> <prabhakar.csengg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Lad, Prabhakar >>>> <prabhakar.csengg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>>> From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>> >>>>> This patch fixes the check for the offset in >>>>> gpio_to_irq_unbanked() function. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> >>>> Is this a regression that should go in right now? >>>> >>> Yes it needs too. >> >> But on top of *what* exactly? >> >> This does not apply to my gpio tree devel branch and >> not even on the mainline kernel. >> > Looks like this needs to go via ARM tree as the earlier > patches have gone via ARM tree itself [1]. > If you can ACK it Sekhar can get it in via ARM tree. The dependent patches are all in linux-next through ARM SoC queued for v3.13 merge. This fix can either be sent late in merge cycle once Linus has pulled ARM SoC or after v3.13-rc1 comes out. Thanks, Sekhar -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
