On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 10:59:17AM +0800, Peter Chen wrote:
> > > @@ -83,6 +90,15 @@
> > > */
> > > #define MXS_PHY_SENDING_SOF_TOO_FAST BIT(2)
> > >
> > > +/* imx23 style PHY */
> > > +#define MXS_PHY_IMX23 BIT(3)
> > > +
> > > +/* imx6q style PHY */
> > > +#define MXS_PHY_IMX6Q BIT(4)
> > > +
> > > +/* imx6sl style PHY */
> > > +#define MXS_PHY_IMX6SL BIT(5)
> > > +
> >
> > We will not need these, if we do what I suggested to carry a pointer
> > to mxs_phy_data in mxs_phy.
> >
> > struct mxs_phy {
> > ...
> > struct mxs_phy_data *data;
> > };
> >
> > The check then can be done like below.
> >
> > static inline int is_imx6q_phy(struct mxs_phy *mxs_phy)
> > {
> > return mxs_phy->data == &imx6q_phy_data;
> > }
> >
>
> What's the benefit compared to current one?
Save those pointless flags.
Shawn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
