Re: [PATCH v3 11/11] riscv: Add qspinlock support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> +config RISCV_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS

I'm seeing the following warnings with CONFIG_RISCV_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS=y:

In file included from ./arch/riscv/include/generated/asm/qspinlock.h:1,
                 from kernel/locking/qspinlock.c:24:
./include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h:144:9: warning: "arch_spin_is_locked" redefined
  144 | #define arch_spin_is_locked(l)          queued_spin_is_locked(l)
      |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from ./arch/riscv/include/generated/asm/ticket_spinlock.h:1,
                 from ./arch/riscv/include/asm/spinlock.h:33,
                 from ./include/linux/spinlock.h:95,
                 from ./include/linux/sched.h:2142,
                 from ./include/linux/percpu.h:13,
                 from kernel/locking/qspinlock.c:19:
./include/asm-generic/ticket_spinlock.h:97:9: note: this is the location of the previous definition
   97 | #define arch_spin_is_locked(l)          ticket_spin_is_locked(l)
      |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h:145:9: warning: "arch_spin_is_contended" redefined
  145 | #define arch_spin_is_contended(l)       queued_spin_is_contended(l)
      |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/asm-generic/ticket_spinlock.h:98:9: note: this is the location of the previous definition
   98 | #define arch_spin_is_contended(l)       ticket_spin_is_contended(l)
      |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h:146:9: warning: "arch_spin_value_unlocked" redefined
  146 | #define arch_spin_value_unlocked(l)     queued_spin_value_unlocked(l)
      |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/asm-generic/ticket_spinlock.h:99:9: note: this is the location of the previous definition
   99 | #define arch_spin_value_unlocked(l)     ticket_spin_value_unlocked(l)
      |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h:147:9: warning: "arch_spin_lock" redefined
  147 | #define arch_spin_lock(l)               queued_spin_lock(l)
      |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/asm-generic/ticket_spinlock.h:100:9: note: this is the location of the previous definition
  100 | #define arch_spin_lock(l)               ticket_spin_lock(l)
      |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h:148:9: warning: "arch_spin_trylock" redefined
  148 | #define arch_spin_trylock(l)            queued_spin_trylock(l)
      |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/asm-generic/ticket_spinlock.h:101:9: note: this is the location of the previous definition
  101 | #define arch_spin_trylock(l)            ticket_spin_trylock(l)
      |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h:149:9: warning: "arch_spin_unlock" redefined
  149 | #define arch_spin_unlock(l)             queued_spin_unlock(l)
      |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/asm-generic/ticket_spinlock.h:102:9: note: this is the location of the previous definition
  102 | #define arch_spin_unlock(l)             ticket_spin_unlock(l)


The following diff resolves them for me (please double check):

diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/spinlock.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/spinlock.h
index 4856d50006f28..2d59f56a9e2d1 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/spinlock.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/spinlock.h
@@ -30,7 +30,11 @@ SPINLOCK_BASE_DECLARE(value_unlocked, int, arch_spinlock_t)
 
 #else
 
+#if defined(CONFIG_RISCV_TICKET_SPINLOCKS)
 #include <asm/ticket_spinlock.h>
+#elif defined(CONFIG_RISCV_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS)
+#include <asm/qspinlock.h>
+#endif
 
 #endif


> +DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(qspinlock_key);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(qspinlock_key);
> +
> +static void __init riscv_spinlock_init(void)
> +{
> +	char *using_ext;
> +
> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZACAS) &&
> +	    IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZABHA)) {
> +		using_ext = "using Zabha";
> +
> +		asm goto(ALTERNATIVE("j %[no_zacas]", "nop", 0, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZACAS, 1)
> +			 : : : : no_zacas);
> +		asm goto(ALTERNATIVE("nop", "j %[qspinlock]", 0, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZABHA, 1)
> +			 : : : : qspinlock);
> +	}
> +
> +no_zacas:
> +	using_ext = "using Ziccrse";
> +	asm goto(ALTERNATIVE("nop", "j %[qspinlock]", 0,
> +			     RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICCRSE, 1)
> +		 : : : : qspinlock);
> +
> +	static_branch_disable(&qspinlock_key);
> +	pr_info("Ticket spinlock: enabled\n");
> +
> +	return;
> +
> +qspinlock:
> +	pr_info("Queued spinlock %s: enabled\n", using_ext);
> +}
> +

Your commit message suggests that riscv_spinlock_init() doesn't need to
do anything if CONFIG_RISCV_COMBO_SPINLOCKS=n:

diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
index d7c31c9b8ead2..b2be1b0b700d2 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
@@ -244,6 +244,7 @@ static void __init parse_dtb(void)
 #endif
 }
 
+#if defined(CONFIG_RISCV_COMBO_SPINLOCKS)
 DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(qspinlock_key);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(qspinlock_key);
 
@@ -275,6 +276,11 @@ static void __init riscv_spinlock_init(void)
 qspinlock:
 	pr_info("Queued spinlock %s: enabled\n", using_ext);
 }
+#else
+static void __init riscv_spinlock_init(void)
+{
+}
+#endif
 
 extern void __init init_rt_signal_env(void);


Makes sense?  What am I missing?

  Andrea




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux