On Mon, 28 Oct 2013, Henrik Austad wrote: > Hi Rob, Jiri > > If this email goes the wrong place, my sincere apologies, my asbestos > underwear can be quickly donned! > > I've been reading through some of the docs and one thing that has struct > me, is that there is a certain degree of bitrot (textrot?). Almost every > category has an outdated 00-INDEX. A couple of indexes has been updated > (thanks for applying Jiri!), but more remains. > > This is obviously not the most important job to undertake, but it > serves as a very convenient starting-point when exploring a given topic. > > Hacking away at python shows me that of the 254 subfolders 57 has outdated > 00-INDEX, either with missing files, or files that has been removed. (see > list below) > > Now, I'm quite happy to start fixing this, but what I would like to know > before I start: > > - is it considered a waste of time? i.e. will it be worth the time That definitely depends purely on you, as you are the sole owner of your own time :) I'd be happy to apply the fixes if you decide to produce them, as keeping the references broken isn't really nice. > - what is best, a single, big patch, or a series of one patch per > directory? For this particular thing, I'd prefer single big patch. I can handle the (very unlikely) conflict cases. > - or should someone(tm) kick whoever caused 00-INDEX to be outdated, to fix > it? That's probably more effort than actually fixing it :) Thanks, -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
