Hi Rob, Jiri If this email goes the wrong place, my sincere apologies, my asbestos underwear can be quickly donned! I've been reading through some of the docs and one thing that has struct me, is that there is a certain degree of bitrot (textrot?). Almost every category has an outdated 00-INDEX. A couple of indexes has been updated (thanks for applying Jiri!), but more remains. This is obviously not the most important job to undertake, but it serves as a very convenient starting-point when exploring a given topic. Hacking away at python shows me that of the 254 subfolders 57 has outdated 00-INDEX, either with missing files, or files that has been removed. (see list below) Now, I'm quite happy to start fixing this, but what I would like to know before I start: - is it considered a waste of time? i.e. will it be worth the time - what is best, a single, big patch, or a series of one patch per directory? - or should someone(tm) kick whoever caused 00-INDEX to be outdated, to fix it? thanks! List of filesystems with outdated index name of dir: (index_not_folder / in_folder_not_index) filesystems: (5/17) filesystems/nfs: (1/2) m68k: (0/1) serial: (1/2) leds: (0/4) arm: (10/7) blackfin: (0/2) ide: (1/1) fb: (3/3) networking: (3/12) scsi: (0/8) power: (1/2) filesystems: (5/17) filesystems/nfs: (1/2) arm: (10/7) RCU: (0/1) mmc: (4/0) fmc: (4/0) w1: (2/0) w1/masters: (1/2) w1/slaves: (0/1) timers: (0/3) devicetree: (5/1) serial: (1/2) leds: (0/4) arm: (10/7) fb: (3/3) power: (1/2) mmc: (4/0) w1: (2/0) w1/masters: (1/2) w1/slaves: (0/1) powerpc: (4/0) x86: (0/8) PCI: (1/1) isdn: (1/0) powerpc: (4/0) laptops: (1/2) vm: (4/7) virtual: (3/0) scheduler: (0/1) x86: (0/8) s390: (2/2) filesystems: (5/17) filesystems/nfs: (1/2) arm: (10/7) serial: (1/2) leds: (0/4) arm: (10/7) fb: (3/3) power: (1/2) mmc: (4/0) w1: (2/0) w1/masters: (1/2) w1/slaves: (0/1) powerpc: (4/0) x86: (0/8) -- Henrik Austad
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
