Re: [PATCH v12 3/7] iio: core: Add new DMABUF interface infrastructure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 20 Jun 2024, Markus Elfring wrote:

> …
> > v11:
> …
> >     - Use guard(mutex)
> >
> > v12:
> >     - Revert to mutex_lock/mutex_unlock in iio_buffer_attach_dmabuf(),
> >       as it uses cleanup GOTOs
> …
> 
> I would find it nice if better design options could gain acceptance.
> Will the chances grow to adjust scopes another bit for involved variables
> in such function implementations?
> 
> A) Enclosing a source code part with extra curly brackets?
> 
> B) scoped_guard()?
>    https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.10-rc4/source/include/linux/cleanup.h#L137
> 
> C) Moving a locked source code part into a separate function implementation?

I think it would help your cause if you quoted the exact piece of code
you're referring to.  Then tone down the language a bit - keep it as
simple and natural as you can.

Ex 1: Please place curly brackets around this section to aid with <reason>

Ex 2: To save N lines of clean-up, please use scoped_guard()

Ex 3: Moving out this chunk to another function would help with <reason>

Etc.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux