Re: [PATCH v12 3/7] iio: core: Add new DMABUF interface infrastructure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



…
> v11:
…
>     - Use guard(mutex)
>
> v12:
>     - Revert to mutex_lock/mutex_unlock in iio_buffer_attach_dmabuf(),
>       as it uses cleanup GOTOs
…

I would find it nice if better design options could gain acceptance.
Will the chances grow to adjust scopes another bit for involved variables
in such function implementations?

A) Enclosing a source code part with extra curly brackets?

B) scoped_guard()?
   https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.10-rc4/source/include/linux/cleanup.h#L137

C) Moving a locked source code part into a separate function implementation?


Regards,
Markus





[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux